doobin
Well-known member
….it was 29k actually!That’s a lovely looking machine - makes @doobin £20k JCB look even more of a bargain though!![]()
….it was 29k actually!That’s a lovely looking machine - makes @doobin £20k JCB look even more of a bargain though!![]()
I’m talking about how much I’m going to pay for it…….it was 29k actually!
Sorry mate but it’s a 9 tonner for life with the meagre amount I use it each year!I’m talking about how much I’m going to pay for it…
Ffs. 100% consensus on loosing the blade angle and now you come along with a contrarian view!Your over thinking it too much, you dont need anything more than 600s. Your not on bogland, and if 450s are getting past then even 550s will be a huge difference.
Go for the 600 off set or cut down 550s or what ever they are, leave the blade alone
It's in the back of my mind- but lack of time currently, hence the musing about just tying it tight with chains and binders for this winterYou absolutely sure that you can't modify the frame to keep the angle blade and run wide tracks ? ........
..... I know that a lot of people get hung up on the whole CE marking thing but I suspect that you're not one of them![]()
But loose the angle or not? 600mm centred or 600mm offset to keep the blade?I'm 100% with Aiden.
We've been around a few wide track setups..... None have helped enough to outweigh the drawbacks with the extra width..... and a KX080 on woodland work that just malleted the rails/chains and ate bottom rollers sums it up for me
Id go 600mm and lose the blade myself. Centralise the wear and also keeps the overall width downBut loose the angle or not? 600mm centred or 600mm offset to keep the blade?
But loose the angle or not? 600mm centred or 600mm offset to keep the blade?
Ok. So… I think there’s a chance that I could run 609s centrally and keep the blade.You absolutely sure that you can't modify the frame to keep the angle blade and run wide tracks ? ........
..... I know that a lot of people get hung up on the whole CE marking thing but I suspect that you're not one of them![]()
Surely when the blade tilts though the rams arc out slightly so would then foul the tracks?Ok. So… I think there’s a chance that I could run 609s centrally and keep the blade.
Loose the blade ram guards (I know, I know), and flip the rams so the ports are on the other side. Mag drill as much of a circle as the weld seam will allow in the blade frame to fit some bulkhead fittings to keep the hoses out of harms way.
Might need to add a couple of collars to the rams to restrict travel each way if it looks like it’ll hit when fully offset. Or cut a smidge off each track pad.
I think it’s ’won’t know till we try!’
View attachment 78017View attachment 78018View attachment 78019View attachment 78020View attachment 78021
"Might need to add a couple of collars to the rams to restrict travel each way if it looks like it’ll hit when fully offset. Or cut a smidge off each track pad."Surely when the blade tilts though the rams arc out slightly so would then foul the tracks?
Yes i'm really not keen on the idea of offset, particularly 225mm one side and 400mm the other. Surely it will wear the chains double quick?To me if the machine is planted centrally on the tracks you are spreading the weigh equally on the track pads. As soon as you offset the pads the weight of the machine pressing down the rollers/idlers and sprockets asymmetrically cause contortion and wear, I think to gain true equal flotation across the pad they would be better placed centrally![]()
If your on ground that needs wide tracks you'll be fine.Yes i'm really not keen on the idea of offset, particularly 225mm one side and 400mm the other. Surely it will wear the chains double quick?
Unless we are talking about delivery companiesIf Big Aidy says it'll work, it'll work![]()
Different Aidy…. They’re all related, the bastards!Unless we are talking about delivery companies![]()