The 'Today's Job' thread

Storrsy

Storrsy

Well-known member
Went to the oldest house in leicestershire today. Built in 1200 something and "modernised " in 1620 something 🤣. Had been lived in continuously till 1960s! Got chatting to a guy there and was asking if the building was as it was back then and he was saying it was. I couldn't believe how tidy it was and how advanced things were even back then. I did mean to clarify with the windows did we have Opening windows back then?! Ill be honest the house looked comfortable although maybe not so much in depths of winter?! Then went to a monastery where I worked on conversion of outbuildings into trappist brewery 8 years ago. Had never tried the beer. Don't drink often nowadays but thought I'd give it a go. Lovely grounds in the monastery.
Makes me laugh with building regs. We think we're so advanced these days with all the modern materials and techniques still available yet will the builds of today still be standing in 800 years time.
My parents live in an old granite farmhouse. The thing is literally sat on the bare ground, with quoin stone arrangements which would be laughed at today but it's 400yrs old and still standing fine.
 
M

Monkeybusiness

Well-known member
Makes me laugh with building regs. We think we're so advanced these days with all the modern materials and techniques still available yet will the builds of today still be standing in 800 years time.
My parents live in an old granite farmhouse. The thing is literally sat on the bare ground, with quoin stone arrangements which would be laughed at today but it's 400yrs old and still standing fine.
My dad’s house was 400 years old, sat on a sandstone plinth with no footings. The floor downstairs was quarry tiles laid directly on the soil below.
I went there today, and amazingly it is all still standing! 🤣
 
V8Druid

V8Druid

do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better
My dad’s house was 400 years old, sat on a sandstone plinth with no footings. The floor downstairs was quarry tiles laid directly on the soil below.
I went there today, and amazingly it is all still standing! 🤣
our barn is circa 1627 .... with some gert rocks at its base .. still there :giggle::giggle: ... 400 years old next year
 
S

Smiffy

Well-known member
The old houses move through and that's alright because their whole construction allows for movement. Modern brick houses are completely rigid and crack because of this.
I personally think that between environmental concerns and everything else a traditional timber frame or even a Nordic style tongue and groove sat on a raft must be hard to beat. Bit of subsidence doesn't matter, nice and environmentally friendly timber. In a lot of areas, less concrete below dpc.
Considering our green drive I'm amazed at the proliferation of bricks still.
Plus planting some trees for timber might give some future jobs
 
hiluxman

hiluxman

Well-known member
The old houses move through and that's alright because their whole construction allows for movement. Modern brick houses are completely rigid and crack because of this.
I personally think that between environmental concerns and everything else a traditional timber frame or even a Nordic style tongue and groove sat on a raft must be hard to beat. Bit of subsidence doesn't matter, nice and environmentally friendly timber. In a lot of areas, less concrete below dpc.
Considering our green drive I'm amazed at the proliferation of bricks still.
Plus planting some trees for timber might give some future jobs
Greed drive I think you mean.

Anything that's sensible doesn't come into it...all about the money you can't have.
 
Gunners

Gunners

Well-known member
@Gunners is our local star he can probably give the best feedback on YouTube’s success
I'm not sure I can talk about success on YouTube. I've had some good opportunities come up from it sure - Bauma last year curtsey of iDig was a highlight. But most of the time I just try and put something up that I would want to watch and hope others do too. I've not had a video do anywhere near 100k views yet and I've been posting stuff since 2019. You have to really do it for the love. According to my analytics, in the last 29 days I've earned £117 from YouTube and had 65k views. Now, its not views that make money - its watch time. But you can assume the people getting 200k views on a video and posting once/ twice a week are doing well - but that's far from everybody.
Digging is a super niche topic, so I am already restricting my viewers before you even start. And even in the niche, many wont enjoy my videos, which is fair enough, I'm nowhere near as exciting as Cammarrata as I don't want to set fire to my machines for views and all the trees on my sites seem to be under TPO's so going around pushing them over like Letsdig18 wont work for me. I could do the "will it start" genre with my wacker plate maybe? :LOL:

If you fancy giving it a go then go for it! Its super easy to do, things don't have to be all that polished in our game to be watchable. But you have to have an edge to whatever you are putting up. Think what your point of view would be, or your angle on the job in hand, that's what makes it interesting I think.
Or build Lego sets - massive audience, don't need to talk, just buy the latest set and time lapse you putting it together. Then review it after ;)
 
Storrsy

Storrsy

Well-known member
I'm not sure I can talk about success on YouTube. I've had some good opportunities come up from it sure - Bauma last year curtsey of iDig was a highlight. But most of the time I just try and put something up that I would want to watch and hope others do too. I've not had a video do anywhere near 100k views yet and I've been posting stuff since 2019. You have to really do it for the love. According to my analytics, in the last 29 days I've earned £117 from YouTube and had 65k views. Now, its not views that make money - its watch time. But you can assume the people getting 200k views on a video and posting once/ twice a week are doing well - but that's far from everybody.
Digging is a super niche topic, so I am already restricting my viewers before you even start. And even in the niche, many wont enjoy my videos, which is fair enough, I'm nowhere near as exciting as Cammarrata as I don't want to set fire to my machines for views and all the trees on my sites seem to be under TPO's so going around pushing them over like Letsdig18 wont work for me. I could do the "will it start" genre with my wacker plate maybe? :LOL:

If you fancy giving it a go then go for it! Its super easy to do, things don't have to be all that polished in our game to be watchable. But you have to have an edge to whatever you are putting up. Think what your point of view would be, or your angle on the job in hand, that's what makes it interesting I think.
Or build Lego sets - massive audience, don't need to talk, just buy the latest set and time lapse you putting it together. Then review it after ;)
I used to watch a bit of Camarata but was always rough on the gear for no good reason, pulling out bed rock with a tilting bucket- cringe watching but maybe that's what people like to watch . Went back to watch one of his today and found the video pretty grating tbh. I'd sooner watch one of your review videos- ok it may not draw the numbers in but real world in depth reviews of plant by someone who isn't a salesman are really far and few between I find. I also prefer English people on vidoes than the American dramatisation!
 
doobin

doobin

Well-known member
Same s**t different day. Only a mile to move the machines which is nice.
IMG_1463.jpeg
 
doobin

doobin

Well-known member
This is why I like the reduced tailswing of the E27. It’s just as stable as a big arse machine. But it fits.

Luckily in this case I only needed a vaguely level T450 shaped slot. Usual story with a runoff from a holloway- it was nowhere near deep enough. This should sort it.

Any ideas what the interesting brick arch structure is?
IMG_1464.jpeg
IMG_1466.jpeg
IMG_1467.jpeg
IMG_1469.jpeg
IMG_1468.jpeg
 
Silversabre

Silversabre

Well-known member
This is why I like the reduced tailswing of the E27. It’s just as stable as a big arse machine. But it fits.

Luckily in this case I only needed a vaguely level T450 shaped slot. Usual story with a runoff from a holloway- it was nowhere near deep enough. This should sort it.

Any ideas what the interesting brick arch structure is?View attachment 85039View attachment 85041

WW2 structure associated with Home Guard or sabotage in event of invasion, as your are coastal?
 
Lancs Lad

Lancs Lad

Well-known member
This is why I like the reduced tailswing of the E27. It’s just as stable as a big arse machine. But it fits.

Luckily in this case I only needed a vaguely level T450 shaped slot. Usual story with a runoff from a holloway- it was nowhere near deep enough. This should sort it.

Any ideas what the interesting brick arch structure is?View attachment 85037View attachment 85038View attachment 85039View attachment 85040View attachment 85041
Inside looks like a lime kiln. Loads up here
 
B

Brendan

Well-known member
Not the prettiest of jobs was called in to try and level out this mess, micro and tracked dumpers on one side as nothing else would fit under the platform and craning something decent was also off the cards, other side was the 3t. Not the best of finishes but only had a day on each side and it's been formed/contoured by the ground staff to their own design to suit their plant and fish so had to try and get what I could underneath the platform and roughly level the rest. The near side according to idig is not too far off level but I still don't really trust it and don't see the appeal, it's just not accurate enough. It's probably user error or setup but still not great
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20260914_103651192.MP.jpg
    PXL_20260914_103651192.MP.jpg
    403.3 KB · Views: 41
  • PXL_20260914_104840123.jpg
    PXL_20260914_104840123.jpg
    399.5 KB · Views: 37
  • PXL_20260914_105046018.jpg
    PXL_20260914_105046018.jpg
    386.1 KB · Views: 34
  • PXL_20260917_143117285.jpg
    PXL_20260917_143117285.jpg
    458.5 KB · Views: 35
  • PXL_20260918_144904735.jpg
    PXL_20260918_144904735.jpg
    432.8 KB · Views: 35
Grahams

Grahams

Don't complain - suggest what's better
Not the prettiest of jobs was called in to try and level out this mess, micro and tracked dumpers on one side as nothing else would fit under the platform and craning something decent was also off the cards, other side was the 3t. Not the best of finishes but only had a day on each side and it's been formed/contoured by the ground staff to their own design to suit their plant and fish so had to try and get what I could underneath the platform and roughly level the rest. The near side according to idig is not too far off level but I still don't really trust it and don't see the appeal, it's just not accurate enough. It's probably user error or setup but still not great
If your idig is not showing the same as reality you need to get it recalibrated. When it is set up correctly I found it impressively accurate and never heard any complaints from anyone else about lake of accuracy.
 
B

Brendan

Well-known member
If your idig is not showing the same as reality you need to get it recalibrated. When it is set up correctly I found it impressively accurate and never heard any complaints from anyone else about lake of accuracy.
I just find the digging or pulling depth doesnt match the static depth of placing the bucket. Machine has less than 700 hours so cant see there being that much pin movement or flex in slew ring to show it being out so much.
Im going to do another full reinstall and hopefully that will sort it, latest firmware seems to have helped a but but not a fan
 
Furniss

Furniss

Well-known member
If your idig is not showing the same as reality you need to get it recalibrated. When it is set up correctly I found it impressively accurate and never heard any complaints from anyone else about lake of accuracy.
yep I dont use mine as much as I should but its very accurate - always agrees with the leica unless ive had a moment.
 
Furniss

Furniss

Well-known member
I just find the digging or pulling depth doesnt match the static depth of placing the bucket. Machine has less than 700 hours so cant see there being that much pin movement or flex in slew ring to show it being out so much.
Im going to do another full reinstall and hopefully that will sort it, latest firmware seems to have helped a but but not a fan
Mine doesnt get used as much as it should but its not because of a lack of accuracy, its very accurate according to the leica.
must be setup
 
Top