14 years of funding cuts.. it’s not rocket science to see where the problems started. Just because we can cite examples of poor decision making in some areas does not mean that the whole council is that incompetent in all areas . There is simply NOT enough money, and social care is taking up way too much of the money. We have too many old people and councils are faced with the terribly tough decisions.
As
@Smiffy just pointed out, you get what you pay for ..
It's also all compounded to the institutionalised mentality and the promotion by seniority idea.
I don't know about other countries but in the UK a non profit driven model never seems to work. Yes privatisation is not brilliant but nationalisation doesn't seem to work either.
I would like to add about the lane rental scheme above that it doesn't work. Surrey run it and it causes more problems than it solves. Firstly the money goes to the central council pot, not the highways Division, secondly by law the council have to charge themselves lane rental for works if they charge contractors. This means the council then try and avoid doing any work on lane rental roads as they get poor value for money. If they do do work on lane rental roads they waste money and don't get it back as it goes into the central pot to be split up between all council departments.
So lane rental roads end up neglected. You get less for your council tax and the utilities companies don't GAF. So no improvement there.
Everyone wants to complain about utility companies but I'm pretty certain that most their problems stem from short staffing as noone wants to the job, it's not exactly very appealing, apart from the fact it's not the greatest work, you then have to deal with the public which is truly sh*t when they all no better than you and go out of there way to be a hindrance.