It's ok saying its untested but imho any issues to arise from lack of time to test it thoroughly are more likely to be that it doesn't work as well as thought rather than it killing people.
man is barely out of nappies, let alone in their infancy in regard to pratting about with DNA ... this 'vaccine' is based on modified RNA, altering, amongst other things, our basic auto-immune system .... never been done before in humans - the poor animals that similar mRNA experiments have been conducted upon previously have not fared well. They have NEVER been allowed to try this before.
Once in you and combined into your DNA it can never be reversed or removed ... think about that .. this is genetic engineering on a global scale, with next to zero understanding of its capacity
to alter the entire human race !!!
Take some time to read the government's 'Emergency Measures' under which this has been pushed through (
@Lynchy put them up a while ago) ... they are effectively 'carte blanche' for the pharmas to charge on as good as blindly, with absolutely zero accountability for **** ups ... no come backs whatsoever. It's a first !!!
I've enough genetic issues with my DNA already (a 1:1,250,000 natural mistake) ... *****ed if I am deliberately going to chuck summat completely untested, with no knowledge of possible outcomes/side effects/etc., into my body, to further screw my DNA, in the hope of dodging a bug I'm pretty sure I've had already and recovered from.
it's every individual's decision, but it should be an informed one and the basis on which medicine is governed ...... but you have to search pretty hard to find the information to give you a fuller picture ... 'our government' certainly ain't providing it and those who try, are being ostracized for doing so.