C****

6

6feetdown

Well-known member
FFS .... just put a toll house at the entrance to every town/village and shut the country down ...
what ****ing planet are they on ? :mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad:
Wales needs them gone ... forever.:mad:
Yep but the sheep and now 14 year old can vote got no chance
 
V8Druid

V8Druid

do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better
and it got 'approved' by a small majority ... of less than 47% of the Welsh population that bothered to vote ..... should've been a compulsory vote .. yes/no/spoiled paper/whatever ... it needed a 100% opinion :mad: :mad::mad:
 
Last edited:
6

6feetdown

Well-known member
So new rental regs coming into force via the Arsembley in Tthe US
20220924_214714.jpg
R of Wales.
 
6

6feetdown

Well-known member
how the hell are they going to define ''abandonded'' ... and 'who' is likely to abandon them :oops::unsure:
Abandoned or not, if the property is in a dire state of repair etc put a charge against it but now way they should be able to take property, yet again going down a very dodgy path
 
V8Druid

V8Druid

do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better
Abandoned or not, if the property is in a dire state of repair etc put a charge against it but now way they should be able to take property, yet again going down a very dodgy path
repossession can only be attributed to the registered owner as defined by HM Land Registry and title deed ..... no way could a council 'take possession' of a legally titled property, unless they were the owners in the first place .... that extract is referencing private landlords repossessing their property without the need to obtain a court order to do so
 
V8Druid

V8Druid

do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better
repossession can only be attributed to the registered owner as defined by HM Land Registry and title deed ..... no way could a council 'take possession' of a legally titled property, unless they were the owners in the first place .... that extract is referencing private landlords repossessing their property without the need to obtain a court order to do so
several years ago councils in Wales were given the powers to 'take possession' of empty/unoccupied properties to be used as social renters, BUT they had a lot of hoops to jump through to achieve it and the property had to be habitable (if you have an empty property without a kitchen or bathroom it's NOT habitable ;) :giggle:) .... I don't know of any locally that they ever managed it with
 
Lancs Lad

Lancs Lad

Well-known member
 
V8Druid

V8Druid

do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better
see it all too often here .... cyclists using ped. crossings like it's a right .... wanna use them - get off the ****ing bike and walk across ... you are a vehicle- obey the rules of the road- a few may just have been re-written for the tossers ... but there's a lot who have no idea how to conduct themselves on the public roads with even less idea of the rules and laws they too are subject to 🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬
 
Shovelhands

Shovelhands

Well-known member
see it all too often here .... cyclists using ped. crossings like it's a right .... wanna use them - get off the ****ing bike and walk across ... you are a vehicle- obey the rules of the road- a few may just have been re-written for the tossers ... but there's a lot who have no idea how to conduct themselves on the public roads with even less idea of the rules and laws they too are subject to 🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬

I had a word out the window once at a teenage lad, who was riding his bike on the pavement, whilst talking on his phone and then proceeded to bring traffic to a sudden halt as he’s turned and used a zebra crossing! Wanka! When I confronted him on how many things were wrong with what he was doing/had done, apparently I was being unreasonable!!
Most people don’t know that the law still states a £500 fine for cycling on the pavement! Unless that’s been changing in those recent rule changes?

Edit, just checked and that £500 maximum fine is still the case as far as I can see.
 
F

fred

Well-known member
repossession can only be attributed to the registered owner as defined by HM Land Registry and title deed ..... no way could a council 'take possession' of a legally titled property, unless they were the owners in the first place .... that extract is referencing private landlords repossessing their property without the need to obtain a court order to do so

problem is massive amounts are not registered with land reg. Only land sold post 1940ish is listed.
 
doobin

doobin

Well-known member
I've read that before somewhere ...... farmers - 1 ---- hand crankers/merchant bankers - nil :love::love::love:
Wouldn't work here. In the States you can just hand the keys back- here, you are liable for all you borrowed. So if a house is reposessed with the owner owing £100k, and sells at auction for £75k- the owner is still liable for the outstanding £25k.
 
V8Druid

V8Druid

do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better
problem is massive amounts are not registered with land reg. Only land sold post 1940ish is listed.
yes quite true, but not a lot will not be, particularly housing stock and it's possible to do a voluntary registration for not a lot of money ... bit of effort unless one has ALL the relevant doc.s though, but well worth it for security and speed if selling
 
doobin

doobin

Well-known member
yes quite true, but not a lot will not be, particularly housing stock and it's possible to do a voluntary registration for not a lot of money ... bit of effort unless one has ALL the relevant doc.s though, but well worth it for security and speed if selling
I thought it was post 1995 that everything was registered when sold, not 1940?
 
Top