Ranger 2015 2.2 for towing

Storrsy

Storrsy

Well-known member
My Navara is around 28mpg on a daily run (lanes and B roads) not towing but drops dramatically if heavy towing back up around the moor. Although a recent journey with the Wacker and trailer (3 ton) an hrs commute it's was saying 21mpg avg which didn't think was too bad but perhaps a few mpg optimistic. Feel like when it's doing a job I don't care so much!
 
M

Monkeybusiness

Well-known member
you pickup guys are getting dangerously close to my truck figures - it averages about 12 mpg - but half the time its carrying 10.5t 😜
I keep going around in circles but am yet again considering a truck of some sort…
There is no real way I can justify it from an entirely economical point of view for my work, but it would tick a lot of ‘convenience’ boxes.
 
Furniss

Furniss

Well-known member
I keep going around in circles but am yet again considering a truck of some sort…
There is no real way I can justify it from an entirely economical point of view for my work, but it would tick a lot of ‘convenience’ boxes.
yeah well they make life easy in lots of ways - crickey i wouldn't want to go back to following my transport guy with my 6/8t machine on in my landrover with a dumper on a trailer , although it was o.k an I did 10 years of it so it must of worked,bloody hard though organising drliveries of everything as opposed to getting it yourself, this job today, nowhere decent to tip so put skip on ground in field and got gravel out direct into dumper, just so much easier and faster than working around quarry deliveries, tomorrow morning going round by quarry for 10t of washed gravel for a soakaway and same, straight out of skip into trenches
👍 works great for us.
liked my landy though, great for going skiing in but not so good for getting aggs !
20250510_142930.jpg
 
hiluxman

hiluxman

Well-known member
Not to be a snob, I've never bought anything with regards to its mpg, its more a case is it fit for what I want...if yes then I've bought it.

But for comparison my 2000 merc sprinter 313 was avg 26 mpg calculated properly (no trip computer on them) vs my iveco 35c16 that I bought to replace it...purely because of our caz s**t...averages 19mpg. It does exactly the same work as I did with my sprinter. Now tell me that it's all good for the environment this new stuff.
 
doobin

doobin

Well-known member
Not to be a snob, I've never bought anything with regards to its mpg, its more a case is it fit for what I want...if yes then I've bought it.

But for comparison my 2000 merc sprinter 313 was avg 26 mpg calculated properly (no trip computer on them) vs my iveco 35c16 that I bought to replace it...purely because of our caz s**t...averages 19mpg. It does exactly the same work as I did with my sprinter. Now tell me that it's all good for the environment this new stuff.
That’s because the Merc had lost half a ton to rust by then 🤣

To be fair the new Iveco will be double the horsepower of the 2000 sprinter. Thats worth the drop in mpg.
 
hiluxman

hiluxman

Well-known member
That’s because the Merc had lost half a ton to rust by then 🤣

To be fair the new Iveco will be double the horsepower of the 2000 sprinter. Thats worth the drop in mpg.
More like all the restrictive emissions shite that's fitted and the iveco weighs about 600kgs more than the sprinter did.

Both my sprinters were immaculate, it's the usual thing of just keeping them cleaned off regularly.
 
Mogman

Mogman

What man as done, man can do, what never has,maybe
I keep going around in circles but am yet again considering a truck of some sort…
There is no real way I can justify it from an entirely economical point of view for my work, but it would tick a lot of ‘convenience’ boxes.
Plus think of all the prostitutes you could slay😂
Pissing in bottles that you can throw out for your cab window
Sleeping in laybys with rent boys

It’s right up your alley 😂😂
 
Top