Lancs Lad
Well-known member
As ever a sensible postI'd go a step further tbh. There is ever reason local authorities should be able to mandate.... Infact the already can, take bus lanes/chyscolpaths.
If a place has air pollution problems mandating a preference towards EV cars and vans within an area should be seen as an option. I'd also argue you should be mandating sizes..... Your EV car of 5 seats needs to be under 2.3m wide and 4.5m long for example....... Throw in a permit scheme for occasional visitors and a financial assistance scheme for those who work in the area and need to swap a vehicle out.
I'd also say that the likes of Bristol and London should be mandating within the planning framework that sites with a value of X and a working duration of Y should install mains power at the start of the project and utilise tethered plant or EV for a majority of the project..... No need for a forklift to be diesel on a site under an acre..... And cranes already are mostly leccy.
However this is about air pollution.... Not climate change. And it's important to legislate to prevent areas such as where I am from economically slitting the throats of locals to satisfy the political and ideological desires of the blow ins.
But nationally we should not be forcing, mandating or prohibiting.... Infact many places we should be subsidising to upgrade resilience.
Just my opinion.
Resilience...massive topic that's blindly ignored ATM by the masses they just presume electric falls out the sky and will continue to do so.... Take the likes of me and thee with a few hundreds litres of derv in the shed we can go indefinitely...an NPO would absolutely wipe this country out now...no need for nukes. Just a few targeted bits of Semtex on the super grid and boom.
It's definitely talked and planned for behind closed doors and in hushed tones by folk who appreciate the impact it would have ...