GazCro
Well-known member
Only close it when using peckers or when riving at stumps etc if there's bits likely to fly about or if rain is blowing in.Agree, I can't stand operating with the window shut.
Only close it when using peckers or when riving at stumps etc if there's bits likely to fly about or if rain is blowing in.Agree, I can't stand operating with the window shut.
Final is on October 9th at O'Briens quarry in Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire. I will get my PA (@JD450A) to contact you all with details on the piss up that evening - drinks will be free to my loyal fan base if I win but only if you can prove you have subscribed to my Youtube channeldid you win that digger competition in the end by the way ?
Me too, seriously I don't know how these people operate and communicate effectively with the lads on the ground with all the windows shut.I always have the window open only ever close the door in the rain
I thought I was the odd one out looking at the comments on fb about the terrors of a dusty cab and inability to operate without climate control
acrylics do not like windscreen wipers - at allCould even go for one of these on a little plug for the rain
ZQEDY Electric Windshield Wiper Universal 12V Motor Car Accessories For Polaris Ranger https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B08FCL1...abc_066ANRN1NWAEE9CM0HE9?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
I always have the window open only ever close the door in the rain
I thought I was the odd one out looking at the comments on fb about the terrors of a dusty cab and inability to operate without climate control
Another window open operator here! Has to be sideways rain or really dusty for me to shut it, can’t stand the glare or the lack of fresh air!Only close it when using peckers or when riving at stumps etc if there's bits likely to fly about or if rain is blowing in.
Often I find it's because someone has letters after their name and specifies a square meterage of concrete. Yet even with said letters after their name, they can't use pi.Those square holes for the rugby posts are impressive if all dug by machine. If have a friend who is about to start installing a load of flag poles. Do you know why they go for square holes rather than getting a big auger? Assuming the ground conditions were right it would be much quicker and he couldn't dig a hole as good as that without doing it by hand so will end up using a lot of extra concrete.
I had a feeling that was probably the case, so if he converted a rectangular hole to a cylindrical one of the same volume there should be no issues.Often I find it's because someone has letters after their name and specifies a square meterage of concrete. Yet even with said letters after their name, they can't use pi.
There is also the fact he doesn't have a big auger but does have a digger with a bucket. For a couple of holes for some posts it's easier to just dig them with what you've got it doesn't justify hiring/sourcing a different method.I had a feeling that was probably the case, so if he converted a rectangular hole to a cylindrical one of the same volume there should be no issues.
Seemed an ideal job for a loader as he is going to need to transport the materials some distance off road to each flag pole position - flagpoles over the roof, auger dangling on the front and a little atv trailer full of postcrete and water.
ah, now then......Often I find it's because someone has letters after their name and specifies a square meterage of concrete. Yet even with said letters after their name, they can't use pi.
they certainly are 'up there', for sureThose square holes for the rugby posts are impressive if all dug by machine........
I appreciate that, but I was more interested if there was a technical reason square was better? The guy I know owns no plant of his own, but if it works out for him he will have a lot of flagpoles to erect so we were discussing the easiest way of doing it, then this comes up in a thread, so picking the forums brains, not criticising Ollie.There is also the fact he doesn't have a big auger but does have a digger with a bucket. For a couple of holes for some posts it's easier to just dig them with what you've got it doesn't justify hiring/sourcing a different method.
Was using it other day got 12 piles 150mm x 8m to fill with concrete handy to know the amount you need maths can be reyt handy sometimes hahaah, now then......
that's because it's a black art that most mere mortals have no grasp of Doob .....
unless they have an application for, or use it practically in their daily existence...
it's usually beyond the comprehension of most 'lettered' oiks![]()
I'm not criticising either but tbh the only load a rugby post or flagpole needs to resist is falling over unlike for example a column for a building which may also need to factor in wind lifting it under a roof. You'd think even a 300mm auger hole but deep would be easier and better.I appreciate that, but I was more interested if there was a technical reason square was better? The guy I know owns no plant of his own, but if it works out for him he will have a lot of flagpoles to erect so we were discussing the easiest way of doing it, then this comes up in a thread, so picking the forums brains, not criticising Ollie.
100%. You wouldn't see the farmer boys doing it with a square hole.I'm not criticising either but tbh the only load a rugby post or flagpole needs to resist is falling over unlike for example a column for a building which may also need to factor in wind lifting it under a roof. You'd think even a 300mm auger hole but deep would be easier and better.