Furniss
Well-known member
Exactly..... its a disgrace
pencil in Nov. 5th in yer diary Boyo and buy a few fireworks to add to the effectI've got a load of tyres I would like to get rid ofwhat good cause can I support?
![]()
what is? ... not having a bonfire night to do it onExactly..... its a disgrace
drop in the ocean compared to the oil well fires back when Saddam torched half of the countryI don’t think we need to worry about burning one or two…..
drop in the ocean compared to the oil well fires back when Saddam torched half of the country
biggest 6 acres i've ever seen
FB post from Lord Sean ....
![]()
![]()
.... just asked Sean for some links
I just listened to some of it but missed the golf question. Where was it time wise?
So, they say that its purely revenue driven ( aka a money grab), also admitting there is a absolutely no direct green reason for the change, they justify it all by saying that its to incentivise us all to move to greener, more renewable ways of powering equipment and plant. That sounds good to them I’m sure, but where are the viable greener alternatives for 99% of plant and equipment? there are some greener fuels that we can use immediately, but hang on……they are removing the rebate from that too……
Never had much to do with heating oil, but it's 'much oilier' than kero.is his "heating oil" Kero or gas oil (red diesel) ??
To be fair having kept an eye on the few bigger jobs which have happened in this area over the last few years an incentive to use less fuel and work more economically is no bad thing. Won't work though jobs will just cost more to cover it.
Especially when a lot of them are govt/taxpayer fundedYou will never make big sites run efficiently. Especially if they are on cost +
Especially when a lot of them are govt/taxpayer funded
The version I heard relates to employing young uns- one boy is a boy, two boys are half a boy, and three boys are no boys at all.Even if private funded there are two many places to hide on a big site and to many excuses. I was once told something that seems to ring true. 1 man working is 100% efficient but each additional person is only 75% efficient so by the time you have 100 blokes on site then they are only doing the work of 75.
Equivalent of 25 people may aswell be sat doing nothing out of lost productivity.
What really bugs me with government waste is firstly no one seems to care or is held accountantable for cost overruns and secondly no one mentions it's not government money, it is our money they are wasting and we as tax payers (and future generations of taxpayers) are paying for this.How much extra going on here?
![]()
Transport minister ‘concerned’ as HS2 cost pressures rise to £1.7bn | New Civil Engineer
In his latest six-month report to parliament about the progress of HS2, Stephenson reveals that HS2 Ltd is reporting £1.7bn net potential cost pressures,www.newcivilengineer.com