V8Druid
do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better
TBH James ........ I wondered exactly the same myselfReading between the lines, possibly Rob wasn’t aware of the difference....?
TBH James ........ I wondered exactly the same myselfReading between the lines, possibly Rob wasn’t aware of the difference....?
that makes a lot of sense of the delay for Rob when he was waiting its arrival new .... at the time I couldn't understand the issue, but obviously Engcon had to specially manufacture a hitch under their tilty to match Hydrema's spec. .. hence the delay in arrival .... 'al ist klar ' now ........ still think they're silly buggers though, deviating from the S typeand by such a small amount
....... and very surprised at Numbawun going with it too
![]()
Reading between the lines, possibly Rob wasn’t aware of the difference....?
It’s known as “Hydrema S-Type”, so because it’s got the “S-Type” no one would know/think any different.
Think silly buggers isa bit light Gra!!, could think of a lot better things to call them!!, wouldn’t be so bad if it was a “different” style to look at, you’d get it, but the fact they look ni-on identical throws a spanner in the works.
None of us were aware of the difference James.
Yeh you would, just one of those things, not so bad when you know though, shows it in the bible thoughYep ....... seems a pretty bloody stupid thing to do Ollie.... as said, with S type in the name you'd logically assume that it was a standard 'S type' - a universal standard by design .... if it isn't, it's not standard and therefore NOT an S type, as per design stds.
...... bet 'yer dad' is pissed about it
![]()
and there you have it ...... " Hydrema S type" listed separately ..... wonder what OBF stands for (One Big F**k up)Yeh you would, just one of those things, not so bad when you know though, shows it in the bible thoughView attachment 2759
I would guess it's as they've been made wider Gra and hence 'squarer' which was the main idea, to get away from longer, narrower hangers and have them more 'symetrical' !!S type seems to be moving away from standardisation which seems silly. I use both S40 and S45 and both of those now have two pin centre options for some unknown reason.
Graham
Bit of an old photo from when I got my buckets converted, original 60mm set up, with S-type S60 on top.I would guess it's as they've been made wider Gra and hence 'squarer' which was the main idea, to get away from longer, narrower hangers and have them more 'symetrical' !!![]()
That’s correctI'm not in the office today but will check tomorrow. IIRC, Rob borrowed Ollie's grading beam a while back and that fitted his Hydrema hitch, but I don't know that the converse applies. If this is the case,then a Hydrema hitch can pick up S type attachments but not vice versa.
I'm not in the office today but will check tomorrow. IIRC, Rob borrowed Ollie's grading beam a while back and that fitted his Hydrema hitch, but I don't know that the converse applies. If this is the case,then a Hydrema hitch can pick up S type attachments but not vice versa, so there may be security benefits. In any case, we don't use the term S type when referring to the Hydrema hitch - it's just an Hydrema hitch. As someone (Ollie?) said, the Levellizer has one, but that was built in Denmark. It's (a) standard over there alongside the S type for Engcon, same as the Verachtert (CW) hitch in Holland.
Rob's possibly slightly shorter centres then perhapsThat’s correct
oh well ..... must be shorter then OlIt’s not narrower as would pick I could pick up on front pin no issue.
Sorry - I missed this one earlierI think what it boils down to is that yes the s type is a standardized hitch system but it still needs odd ball sizes to suit machines that are different eg: not all the machines in the same weight category are the same weight or have the same dipper width. So what fits one ok might not on another brand till all the machine manufacturers build to a standard weight/ dipper width a standardized hitch system still needs a bit of an odd ball size to cover all bases
get it right or go home !!!!I'll try and clear this up.
The page out of the RF catalogue that Ollie posted does contain the answers, but unless you speak Scandi, it's not clear. Throughout northern Europe (including the Nordic region) there are several different hitch types and they are not compatible with one another. The S type is now the dominant one in Scandi, and its predecessors (the S1 and S2 - just visible at the bottom of Ollie's graphic) are still around but no longer actively promoted.
The Hydrema hitch is not an S type, but it works in a similar way. It's only available as a 45mm pin and the centres are 100mm further apart at 430mm (it's also marginally narrower). Originally developed for their Backhoes.
Rob's Hydrema (excavator) doesn't have a Hydrema hitch, it has an Engcon S60 type (top and bottom), so Ollie's grading beam will fit it and Rob's buckets should fit Ollie's machine as well. If they don't I'll need to dig further
The catalogue also includes references to other hitch types - Verachtert (CW), Lehnhnof, SMP, Atlas - but there are others (GJ is one). We make tiltrotators with all of these as tiltrotator hitches - as, I believe, do Rototilt in order to satisfy the demands of the markets where these hitches are common.
Whilst writing, I noticed Druid's horror at the prices quoted for adapter bracketsI know these are available from various sources and a number of UK companies offer Scandi-style attachments with S-type brackets. BEWARE! The S type standard also is very clear about tolerances:
View attachment 2801
View attachment 2802
We have had several Owner Ops call to say that the hitch is not working and won't detach their bucket or other attachment, only to get an Engineer to site and find that the offending attachment has been made out of tolerance and is physically stuck. We ourselves have commissioned 'specials' for trials here in the UK from local manufacturers that have had the same problem. The brackets in this catalogue will (I suspect), have been made on a jig and will fit - others may not.![]()