doobin
Well-known member
That's a great policy, which I've often considered myself.At the end of the day if someone is paying £800 in rent and can get a mortgage on the same place for £750 with no deposit the banks should give it to them regardless of what they earn. If they have been paying the rent i cant see a problem.
I agree in principle, however would you have been able to save an extra 30k in the year on top of what you were already saving to cover the increase of a starter house in just one year? 30k is a whole years average wage here. and we are talking about starter houses- far from the average prices for Sussex- 460k.I would slightly disagree being in the position of buying my first house 2 years ago at 26
It is not as impossible to save a deposit as a lot of people my age make out. The problem is you have to work hard and and spend sensibly.
That is what my generation actually struggle with. The amount of people I know that say they can't afford a house whilst having a financed Merc and a wardrobe full of Desiigner clothes is unreal.
I'm assuming you worked very hard and also have not gone out and bought a three bedroom detatched. Wouldn't it be nice if your hard work was actual;ly rewarded, so you could actually afford a house slightly better? As it stands, the 60 year old postman is living in a three bedroom detatched house in the country, whilst the modern high fliers earning well above average wages are in shitty new build estates and have been conned into thinking they're doing well!
Anecdotally, I have never been on a new build estate that hasn't had two German cars (no doubt on contract rental, not purchase) on the driveways of most houses! These, however, are the same people who thought 'help to buy' on a property valued at over 400k as a starter house was a good thing. Presumably they never stopped to wonder why Persimmon's profits went up by 49k per house in the same year a 50k help to buy was introduced.
We have to stop kicking the can down the road at some point.
I am up to date with the latest landlord tax rules, hence my bracketed stipulation about these rules actually being enforced! I can't see any way out of this other than a crash. The average young person would be better off unemployed than working a full week just to have a litttle left over after paying the landlord. Work needs to be rewarded, as I alluded to above. Should a crash occur, it would be nice to see a return to a more meritocratic society, whereby people like us who take a risk in life and start a business are rewarded with a slightly better standard of life.My counter to that is that a house price crash will effect the young more than the old. House price crashes tend to lead to lower consumer spending which fuels the unemployment. This being more so in the younger generation than the middle generation. As for saving for deposits. We have fuelled a boom in new house prices with the government help to buy scheme. I won’t go into the rant about buy to let as you are probably not up to date with the latest tax rules. Buy to let is no easy get rich scheme. As for repatriation. I am afraid that you are deluded to thing that will happen in today’s society!! National socialism may have a future but hopefully not in the manner you portray!
As for immigration- I can't see how anyone can claim that free immigration doesn't drag down the living standards of everyone except the richest business owners. Lorry drivers are currently in demand, for example, and celebrating increased wages. Had we not had unrestricted immigration from the EU for the last decade, wages might still have been at a sensible level already, rather than basically minimum wage for a lot of responsibility.