pettsy
Well-known member
Everyone wants to pass the blame these days, had the same with an Isuzu Dmax!Let's just say VW UK say one thing, dealer another, aftermarket accessories another etc etc....
Everyone wants to pass the blame these days, had the same with an Isuzu Dmax!Let's just say VW UK say one thing, dealer another, aftermarket accessories another etc etc....
Yep ..but I was first told by VW that they were fitted as standard. ..then told you can't fit canopys..ongoing.View attachment 56972View attachment 56973would assume the amarok is the same
Might only be factory fit if ordered with a canopy or rolltop. Only way to tell is reove the arch liner and see if they are there. From the ford versions they leave the problem with the aftermarket people who either don't know or careYep ..but I was first told by VW that they were fitted as standard. ..then told you can't fit canopys..ongoing.
You’d think the addition of a canopy would add rigidity to the tub - I guess they must have had issues with chassis/tub flex leading to canopies making contact with the back of the crewcab possibly?what the hell do they need these for if the headboard is properly secured to the rest of the tub?? ..... looks to be a design problem if they're having to add on bits of brackets to keep the tub together
if fitting a canopy to the upper rim of the tub, if it isn't a secure perimeter, causes issues, there is obviously a flaw in the design![]()
It’s such a ridiculous situation!!! It’s literally one of two options everyone adds to a pickup - a canopy or a roller track!!You’d think the addition of a canopy would add rigidity to the tub - I guess they must have had issues with chassis/tub flex leading to canopies making contact with the back of the crewcab possibly?
Exactly. Something is not adding up.You’d think the addition of a canopy would add rigidity to the tub - I guess they must have had issues with chassis/tub flex leading to canopies making contact with the back of the crewcab possibly?
Think 20mpg if you lucky and about 15 mile on battery.“The distinguished history of the Toyota Hilux will open a new chapter with the launch of a new 48V mild hybrid electric version. An electric motor will View attachment 57259support the pick-up’s 2.8-litre engine, giving more responsive acceleration, improved braking and a smoother ride, together with greater fuel efficiency. “
I don’t care about efficiency, I want big diesel power!!!!
what is the bloody pointThink 20mpg if you lucky and about 15 mile on battery.
No surprise why massive waiting list on V6 roks and rangers.
Tick the woke boxwhat is the bloody point![]()
Probably to satisfy some bs eu directiveTick the woke box
what is the bloody point![]()
My disco has something similar, you’d never know it’s got any elec in it at all, but what it does do is fill the gap in turbo lag etc.. self charging so no buggery cables.what is the bloody point![]()
can't you switch it off?No idea, but i bloody hate stop start! I’d happily have it removed from any vehicle!
Exactly this - I’ve got a 2.8 hilux and bought it largely because it has a decent sized engine. It should be a great truck but it’s very ‘meh’ if I’m honest, I preferred my pre-adblu 2l Navara to drive.Modern engines being so strangled by emission tech the addition of hybrid tech allows manufacturers to deliver the ever increasing performance that people want.
The 2.8 Hilux is ok but uninspiring. The 2.4 is flat as hell.
Tbh additional performance is the best use for battery tech. Far better than aiming to replace internal combustion
Most can be deactivated, fords through forscan or just wait for your battery to loose some voltage, some times something as simple as disconnecting the sensor near the negative terminal will also do it.No idea, but i bloody hate stop start! I’d happily have it removed from any vehicle!