expose-news.com
so WTF are they planning on doing for milk and other dairy products then? ......Irish government proposes culling 200,000 cows to meet climate targets - The Expose
An internal document, a Department of Agriculture briefing paper, reveals that a €200m budget is needed to cull 65,000 cows every year for three years to meet climate goals - that’s 195,000 cows in total. Culling 200,000 Irish dairy cows is the wrong way to meet Ireland’s climate targets, the...
and probably insufficient product if they had the facility anyway 
That's the plan if you control the food you control the peopleso WTF are they planning on doing for milk and other dairy products then? ......
this crap has got to stop ..
before we're all starving ......
How do we use our vote to let them know we aren’t on board . Who is standing up for common sense ???Thank F some of us have ways and means to be self sufficient if push came to shove.
Feels like we slowly heading backwards....
None of them they are all in it
www.bbc.co.uk
Welcome to the Welsh circus run by clownsGwynedd: Planning permission for second homes proposed
A councillor says second homes are "immoral" amid a "huge housing crisis" in one Welsh county.
I know it's an emotive topic but this smacks of we haven't got a decent housing policy so let's blame 2nd Homes to deflect attention and keep all the independent crowd happy. Just as long as it goes as well as the SNP it should end well.
Yes there's some fiddling going on but wtf else brings in income in some of these Welsh villages?
It’ll be the lakes next and then Skye and the highlandsWelcome to the Welsh circus run by clowns
exactly ... throw a drowning man an anchor ... lot of folk'll simply register them as primary residence and pay std council tax on their other property ..... and if they have any sense they'll register as a single occupancy and get a 25% discount to bootGwynedd: Planning permission for second homes proposed
A councillor says second homes are "immoral" amid a "huge housing crisis" in one Welsh county.
I know it's an emotive topic but this smacks of we haven't got a decent housing policy so let's blame 2nd Homes to deflect attention and keep all the independent crowd happy. Just as long as it goes as well as the SNP it should end well.
Yes there's some fiddling going on but wtf else brings in income in some of these Welsh villages?
And the people who have bought these houses at inflated prices (if they don't get planning permission) are going to sell them at a loss so the locals cant afford them? yeah right.Gwynedd: Planning permission for second homes proposed
A councillor says second homes are "immoral" amid a "huge housing crisis" in one Welsh county.
I know it's an emotive topic but this smacks of we haven't got a decent housing policy so let's blame 2nd Homes to deflect attention and keep all the independent crowd happy. Just as long as it goes as well as the SNP it should end well.
Yes there's some fiddling going on but wtf else brings in income in some of these Welsh villages?
and each claim a 25% single occupancy discountAnd the people who have bought these houses at inflated prices (if they don't get planning permission) are going to sell them at a loss so the locals cant afford them? yeah right.
The normal home will become her permeant address, and his will be Abersoch.
As you say just making noise to kept people happy, (Plaid propping up labour)
.... we considered doing the same here, when I still had my house in town (have since sold it), but could well have had 5-6 years discounts on both -- just too honest (for our own good) were paying full on both
www.bbc.co.uk
I think it is just a different name for socialism!!Business 'ready to work towards wellbeing economy'
The government is looking to work with industry to turn the economy towards wellbeing more than profit .
Wonder if they actually understand basic business principles....without profit you have ...
And quoting sturgeon
Was talking to a mate on Friday who works for TFL (nice work if you can get it, they look after there own...).
He was asked to run his eye over a project another department are running:
They are concerned the new fixed ULEZ cameras will be vandalised, so-
They plan to rent a fleet of electric vans, big ones, fitted with ULEZ cameras, park them at certain locations to catch anyone with the cheek to drive their own car on certain roads, then put a bloke in each van to guard it!
Total cost about a million quid apparently...
Not working for TFL I was able to suggest a couple of real world money saving solutions:
Use smaller, therefore cheaper, electric vans!! Just put the camera on a pole on the roof if it needs to be up high, can't see why, numberplates are Normally visible from ground level
Or, slightly Tongue in cheek- buy a fleet of non ulez compliant vans, they're dirt cheap now for some reason!!, leave them just outside the boundary, save an absolute fortune on vans!
Or, and this is the most sensible-
HAVE THE BLOKES GUARDING THE MOBILE CAMERAS GUARD THE ORIGINAL FIXED CAMERAS!!!! No need for any vans full of cameras! Sorry that's just too simple isn't it, and saves a literal fortune, can't be having that.
No wonder every government goes over budget and over time ffs
To be fair to my mate he knows almost all TFL decisions are incompetent twaddle but he's not daft and knows which side his breads buttered. We do make sure to give him a hard time about his choice of career though
The question is do you take advantage of these Morons or do you try and help them, its our money ?Was talking to a mate on Friday who works for TFL (nice work if you can get it, they look after there own...).
He was asked to run his eye over a project another department are running:
They are concerned the new fixed ULEZ cameras will be vandalised, so-
They plan to rent a fleet of electric vans, big ones, fitted with ULEZ cameras, park them at certain locations to catch anyone with the cheek to drive their own car on certain roads, then put a bloke in each van to guard it!
Total cost about a million quid apparently...
Not working for TFL I was able to suggest a couple of real world money saving solutions:
Use smaller, therefore cheaper, electric vans!! Just put the camera on a pole on the roof if it needs to be up high, can't see why, numberplates are Normally visible from ground level
Or, slightly Tongue in cheek- buy a fleet of non ulez compliant vans, they're dirt cheap now for some reason!!, leave them just outside the boundary, save an absolute fortune on vans!
Or, and this is the most sensible-
HAVE THE BLOKES GUARDING THE MOBILE CAMERAS GUARD THE ORIGINAL FIXED CAMERAS!!!! No need for any vans full of cameras! Sorry that's just too simple isn't it, and saves a literal fortune, can't be having that.
No wonder every government goes over budget and over time ffs
To be fair to my mate he knows almost all TFL decisions are incompetent twaddle but he's not daft and knows which side his breads buttered. We do make sure to give him a hard time about his choice of career though
