the Global Warming fiasco -- or how to tax the **** out of us

T

Tacitus

Active member

Just shared the article's link on my facebook and it placed a label on the link stating "False information".
If Facebook tries to censor this, he must be onto something for sure. :unsure:
 
V8Druid

V8Druid

do it as well as you can,but learn to do it better

Just shared the article's link on my facebook and it placed a label on the link stating "False information".
If Facebook tries to censor this, he must be onto something for sure. :unsure:
" the UN-backed IPCC is “government-controlled and only issues government-dictated findings”. Along with fellow atmospheric scientist Professor William Happer of Princeton, he told a recent U.S. Government inquiry that current climate science literature was “a joke”. It was “pal review, not peer review”, they added. Of course, the links between climate science and grant-providing politicians are well known. In 2013, the then-head of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, told the Guardian: “We are an intergovernmental body and we do what the governments of the world want us to do. If the governments decide we should do things differently and come up with a vastly different set of products we would be at their beck and call.” " :mad: :mad: 🤬
" Carbon dioxide is noted to be a “particularly ridiculous” choice as a pollutant. Its primary role is as a fertiliser for plants and currently, he adds, “almost all plants are starved of CO2”. Moreover, if we were to remove a bit more than 60% of CO2, the consequences would be dire, “namely death by starvation for all animal life”. Not that such a drop would have much effect on the global temperature, according to Lindzen, with less than a couple of percentage point changes in the radiation budget, leading to a 1°C drop. After all, he concludes, a 30% reduction of solar radiation about 2.5 billion years ago did not lead to an Earth much colder than it is today. "
 
Bob

Bob

Well-known member
Wot no jab no jab
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2023-01-15-15-03-32-197_com.twitter.android.jpg
    Screenshot_2023-01-15-15-03-32-197_com.twitter.android.jpg
    83.6 KB · Views: 213
Last edited:
Bob

Bob

Well-known member
Rumour is that that nice Mr Blair is trying to be next leader of WEF after Klaus retires

BREAKING: Tony Blair calls for a "digital infrastructure" to monitor who is vaccinated and who is not for the "vaccines that will come down the line" at Klaus Schwab's W.E.F conference in Davos.
 
Lancs Lad

Lancs Lad

Well-known member
Rumour is that that nice Mr Blair is trying to be next leader of WEF after Klaus retires

BREAKING: Tony Blair calls for a "digital infrastructure" to monitor who is vaccinated and who is not for the "vaccines that will come down the line" at Klaus Schwab's W.E.F conference in Davos.
Ok I'll just put it out I think best thing Blair did was support bush and twat the terrorists...👊👊
Not the popular opinion but it's mine

Apart from that he's oiled the wheels for the starmer train...pretending to take labour further right in fuddled mess of standing for nothing apart from controlling eco bullshit. Clutching at whatever he thinks might be popular.
 
Top