S
Smiffy
Well-known member
I was sat next to that lorry on the m25 this morning
How the fk did they drop that in there? Must have not been chained on and a brain dead driver.
How the fk did they drop that in there? Must have not been chained on and a brain dead driver.
Does look like side of road is fu**ed a fair way before it hit the tree, whether gone off a way back for whatever reason then caught tree
seen that one before Stu --- IIRC it hadn't done many hours .... the power of oil based products, eh?
View attachment 41508View attachment 41509View attachment 41510
I keep seeing lots of people moving tarmac kit on 4 axle lowloaders & I always say why aren’t vosa tugging them for being over weight because none of the moves are notified & a divisible load
So looking at it another way if they used a lighter weight trailer could they have been less overweight and got off lighter. Would the keyboard warriors have thought that safer?I know they are running bent but I still find it hilarious all the comments saying how dangerous it is being overweight. When in reality the setup is more than capable of handling the weight. Infact it is deemed safe for that setup to carry another 20 odd tonnes. And in reality it is only overweight as it doesn't meet the correct criteria on that day to run over 44t. Yes it's naughty and shouldn't be accepted but it's not exactly dangerous.
It's the same when people complain about tippers being overweight and dangerous when an identical chassis carrying a volumetric mixer is deemed to be safe at a higher weight than an identical chassis carrying mud.
Dodgy in a legal sense yes and unfair on those playing the game properly. But if the equipment is all running within its design then how can it be dangerous.
this is a very good point. Allowing b doubles for RDC work would reduce the lorries on that particular work by 50%Perhaps the operator could justify their actions by saying we're in a climate emergency and he was try so save fuel, thus saving the planet.
Totally agree with this.I know they are running bent but I still find it hilarious all the comments saying how dangerous it is being overweight. When in reality the setup is more than capable of handling the weight. Infact it is deemed safe for that setup to carry another 20 odd tonnes. And in reality it is only overweight as it doesn't meet the correct criteria on that day to run over 44t. Yes it's naughty and shouldn't be accepted but it's not exactly dangerous.
It's the same when people complain about tippers being overweight and dangerous when an identical chassis carrying a volumetric mixer is deemed to be safe at a higher weight than an identical chassis carrying mud.
Dodgy in a legal sense yes and unfair on those playing the game properly. But if the equipment is all running within its design then how can it be dangerous.
There is a company in Ireland that operates B double units......... legally I might addthis is a very good point. Allowing b doubles for RDC work would reduce the lorries on that particular work by 50%
D&E ? See their rigs a lot with crushers etc heading south past us on the 6Totally agree with this.
OK so he had a dodgy tire which won't help his case... and most like drew the attention his way.
But there is nothing unsafe about that load, its well chained and the trailer and truck are more than capable to take the load.... the sad fact is, it might have been legal on a 44ton truck with tri axle trailer
Had this conversation with a driver for a well known heavy haulage company, he was delivering steel to us. They take crushers and screeners out from here to Southampton weekly, they sometimes back load with steel plate to the same companies. With a double drive unit and 5 axle trailer he was only legal to carry 15 tons off plate on the way back.... even though on the way out he was perfectly legal to carry a 50 ton crusher! its just stupid! the unit and trailer was 10 time safer than some of the light weight units you see running about trying to get maximum payload.
All the talk from the government about climate change and environmental concerns and they are saying that this should have been moved on 2 or more loads!! what a bunch of retarded twats!
Yea that's the one's, good outfit. ship a lot of crusher and screeners all over.D&E ? See their rigs a lot with crushers etc heading south past us on the 6