CPS
Well-known member
Yea, not a great price but this is the best way I found.. the garden the same height as the trailerI’d always try back it into pile or bank or lower machine off with arm
Yea, not a great price but this is the best way I found.. the garden the same height as the trailerI’d always try back it into pile or bank or lower machine off with arm
bet you were popular tracking up the bank in the gardenYea, not a great price but this is the best way I found.. the garden the same height as the trailerView attachment 29307
That actually was just moving it Rd Ferodo huge site rathe than tracking it around 3/4 a mile to the stuff we’d dug out with it to load into 6 wheelerslooks very agricultural that Giles![]()
I'll believe youThat actually was just moving it Rd Ferodo huge site rathe than tracking it around 3/4 a mile to the stuff we’d dug out with it to load into 6 wheelers
Who cares! Seriously- if it's easier to just crack on with a tractor and trailer to get the job done then so be it- from an economic sense I'm not sure it would add up running a tractor and trailer solely in place of a lorry- round here I can barely think of a single set up not moving excavators with a tractor. Off the moor is a bit different though!I'll believe you..... thousands might not though
![]()
Ah...someone else with a bottle of red at the ready...As my machines live at yard at parents farm which is 1 hour from my house and limit of our western working limit I don’t use tractor anymore to much hastle and time wasted, Mate moves them job to job with his fastrac setup or can sit in his yard for few weeks between jobs working well. I just meet him at the job have all my tools and stuff in my pickup and can go home at end of day without taking tractor back to yard etc. Don’t do 1 day jobs that offen and if do have the 1.6 ton mini at home for them. Mrs loves the view out the current kitchen window haha![]()
Although I’d never buy anything new the scale of that is impressive . It doesn’t look any bigger than a 7.5 tonner and the ramps wouldn’t be that high up either . It would take all my small plant with easeThought this might interest some just to look at carrying capacity
Even if a tipper body came in at 1.5t that's a pretty impressive load you can carry.
![]()
ISUZU TRUCK F135.240 13.5 T Payload Potential: 9455 Kgs 3Yr Full Warranty | eBay
Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for ISUZU TRUCK F135.240 13.5 T Payload Potential: 9455 Kgs 3Yr Full Warranty at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products!www.ebay.co.uk
By the time you've fitted a body that complies to the latest regulations you will of eaten a good bit of payload. You'd also be increasing the load height as any body fitted will be on a subframe.Although I’d never buy anything new the scale of that is impressive . It doesn’t look any bigger than a 7.5 tonner and the ramps wouldn’t be that high up either . It would take all my small plant with ease
By the time you've fitted a body that complies to the latest regulations you will of eaten a good bit of payload. You'd also be increasing the load height as any body fitted will be on a subframe.
They are wider than an n75 tho.You will still be looking at 3x that of a 7.5t daf for example
I just posted it as an example of what is available when going bigger than 7.5tgvw but staying the same physical size
They are wider than an n75 tho.
In height yes but I don't think an lf45 is much wider than an n75. Which is Almost certainly wider than an isuzu f135I meant same size as an lf45 which dwarfs an n75
In height yes but I don't think an lf45 is much wider than an n75. Which is Almost certainly wider than an isuzu f135