M
Monkeybusiness
Well-known member
Hydrostatic is definitely the way to go, thatās a lovely bit of kit.Of course! Little point otherwise
I spend months considering whether to get one of these (38hp) or go up to 60-80 hp. But then transport becomes an issue, and you will struggle to get the tractor and implement moved in one hit. I also don't want to start chasing other work using more diesel, such as mulching.
From using the old one for a year or so, I'm convinced the hydro transmission makes you back via efficiency the difference in power between 38hp and 60hp. The BCS Spirit 70 (63hp) looked nice and would be towable with implement. But it's a huge chunk of change more (Ā£48k with electric joystick vs Ā£35k with electric joystick for the Carrarro). And it's only got four gears in three ranges with bugger all overlap between ranges. It does have an electronic clutch to save your foot. But that's not the same as easing off your right foot just enough to get through a tough patch of grass, and then straight back up to optimum speed.
Anyway, Kilworth didn't seem to want to sell (salesman never got back to me despite multiple texts and calls for a demo/more details), whereas Kirkland have been very enthusiastic regarding parts for my current model and selling me a new one. I think 38hp hydrostatic is equal in efficiency for my work to 63hp geared, and Antonio Carraro are pretty much the Rolls Royce of alpine tractors also. I just know I'd not be happy with gears.
Iām surprised by Kilworth, theyāve always been great on the odd occasion Iāve dealt with them. Their loss!